Health system changes require clear mandate for Premier Redford

Tuesday, Jan 03, 2012 03:00 am | Dan Singleton

Although Premier Alison Redford continues to hold a large lead over her opposition party rivals, at least according to recent polls, it would be a mistake for the new Alberta leader to assume she has a free hand to radically modify the province’s public health-care system at this point.

While Redford certainly does have the backing of the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party, as evidenced by her recent leadership win, she does not yet have a new mandate from Alberta voters.

And until that happens, Redford should hold back any plans she may or may not have to introduce major health-care reforms until the next provincial election campaign has run its course.

The ever-contentious issue of public versus ­private health care recently raised its head again when federal Conservative finance minister Jim Flaherty announced a new formula for federal health transfers to the provinces.

In an announcement that caused an immediate stir among premiers from coast to coast, Flaherty said in four years’ time federal transfer payments to the provinces will be tied to Gross Domestic Product.

According to some observers, that new system could translate into markedly reduced cash flow into Alberta to pay for hospitals and other health-care services.

Premiers from Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, Manitoba, P.E.I., Newfoundland, Ontario and Quebec all questioned the Flaherty plan.

“It will essentially divide the country into wealthier provinces that have a better ability to provide health care and those with lesser ability to be able to provide the same services,” Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter reportedly said.

Alberta Premier Redford, on the other hand, reportedly said her government is willing to cooperate with the federal government to make the new plan work.

In response, Liberal opposition leader Raj Sherman says he believes Redford’s positive reaction to the Flaherty plan points to hidden plans to privatized health care in Alberta.

“Our premier is silent, which suggests to me that she and her old boys’ club cabinet are perfectly happy to see health transfers trimmed, because it suits their backroom agenda to privatize public health care,” said Sherman.

Anyone who has followed Alberta politics in recent years knows very well that the opposition parties have played the “privatization of health care” card many times, all with little or no impact at the polls.

Yet this time around, Premier Redford would be on dangerous political ground if she uses the announcement of the Flaherty plan as an excuse to move ahead with major health-care reforms before first garnering a new and clear mandate from Alberta voters.


Comments

Be the FIRST to comment!

   
Got something to say? Post Comment!

You haven't entered any comments to post!

The Didsbury Review welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.

In order to post comments on our web site, you must validate your email address. An email was sent to you when you registered that included an activation link. If you have not yet done so, please click on the link to activate your account.

If you did not receive your activation email, please click here to have it resent.

To post comments, you must login or register on didsburyreview.ca
Story URL:

Copyright © 2010 Great West Newspapers Limited Partnership. All rights reserved. The contents of this website are protected by copyright and may be used only for your personal non-commercial purposes. All other rights are reserved and commercial use is prohibited. To make use of any of this material you must first obtain permission of the owner of the copyright. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.